Article by Ayman Alheraki on May 7 2025 11:12 AM
TASM (Turbo Assembler), developed by Borland in the late 1980s, was one of the most popular assemblers of its time. It was designed to compete with MASM from Microsoft and offered:
Fast assembly performance.
Support for both Intel syntax and MASM-compatible syntax.
Excellent integration with Turbo C/C++ and Turbo Pascal.
A comfortable development environment under DOS.
Borland eventually stopped updating TASM:
It was never updated to support newer instruction sets (SSE, AVX, 64-bit).
The last known version (TASM 5.0) was released in the late 1990s.
It became obsolete with the rise of 64-bit computing.
TASM was mainly designed for DOS and early Windows (16/32-bit) systems. Meanwhile:
Modern assemblers support Linux, Windows, and even macOS.
TASM had no official support for 64-bit platforms.
Borland changed its direction:
Focused on RAD tools like Delphi and C++Builder.
Later, parts of the company and its products were sold to Embarcadero.
As a result, Borland abandoned system-level tools like TASM and Turbo Debugger.
Assemblers like:
NASM: Open-source, actively maintained, supports 64-bit.
FASM: Lightweight, fast, powerful; even used in hobby OS development.
GAS: The official GNU assembler, tightly integrated with GCC.
MASM: Still updated by Microsoft to support 64-bit Windows.
These tools became more relevant and accessible compared to the aging, proprietary TASM.
With the rise of high-level languages and powerful libraries, the need to write low-level assembly code declined—except for special performance-critical cases.
Borland shifted investment to higher-level tools with greater market demand.
They didn’t adapt to the industry shift toward 64-bit architectures.
Company fragmentation and product sales deprioritized legacy tools like TASM.
The market preferred open-source, cross-platform, modern assemblers.
Very rare—mainly seen in retro computing or educational contexts.
Not recommended for any modern development project.